Skip Navigation

The British Journal of Aesthetics 2008 48(3):315-337; doi:10.1093/aesthj/ayn023
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Huovinen, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© British Society of Aesthetics 2008

Levels and Kinds of Listeners' Musical Understanding

Erkki Huovinen

Erkki Huovinen, Department of Musicology, University of Turku, Finland. Email: erkhuo{at}utu.fi


   Abstract

This article examines an account of the listener’s musical understanding put forward by Stephen Davies. I begin by discussing Davies’s ‘expressibility requirement’, according to which a musical listener should be able to express his understanding in sentences that are truth-apt. This is followed by a reconstruction of Davies’s argument for the idea that high levels of musical understanding can be attained without possessing music-theoretical concepts. Such a conclusion is seen to follow from his belief that although musical understandings may be evaluatively compared in terms of the concepts of music theory, the listeners themselves can always fulfil the expressibility requirement by employing simple ‘folk-musicological’ terminology. I will attempt to show that this premise is questionable in the light of some central cases of music-structural understanding. I conclude by examining the relationship between Davies’s expressibility requirement and the claim that musical understandings are evaluatively commensurable.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.